An analytical comparison of coalescent-based multilocus methods: The three-taxon case

Incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) is a common source of gene tree incongruence in multilocus analyses. A large number of methods have been developed to infer species trees in the presence of ILS. Here we provide a mathematical analysis of several coalescent-based methods. Our analysis is performed on a three-taxon species tree and assumes that the gene trees are correctly reconstructed along with their branch lengths

Alignment-free phylogenetic reconstruction: Sample complexity via a branching process analysis

We present an efficient phylogenetic reconstruction algorithm allowing insertions and deletions which provably achieves a sequence-length requirement (or sample complexity) growing polynomially in the number of taxa. Our algorithm is distance-based, that is, it relies on pairwise sequence comparisons. More importantly, our approach largely bypasses the difficult problem of multiple sequence alignment.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/12-AAP852 the Annals of Applied Probability (http://www.imstat.org/aap/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

Phylogenetic mixtures: Concentration of measure in the large-tree limit

The reconstruction of phylogenies from DNA or protein sequences is a major task of computational evolutionary biology. Common phenomena, notably variations in mutation rates across genomes and incongruences between gene lineage histories, often make it necessary to model molecular data as originating from a mixture of phylogenies. Such mixed models play an increasingly important role in practice. Using concentration of measure techniques, we show that mixtures of large trees are typically identifiable. We also derive sequence-length requirements for high-probability reconstruction.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/11-AAP837 the Annals of Applied Probability (http://www.imstat.org/aap/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

Phase transition in the sample complexity of likelihood-based phylogeny inference

Reconstructing evolutionary trees from molecular sequence data is a fundamental problem in computational biology. Stochastic models of sequence evolution are closely related to spin systems that have been extensively studied in statistical physics and that connection has led to important insights on the theoretical properties of phylogenetic reconstruction algorithms as well as the development of new inference methods. Here, we study maximum likelihood, a classical statistical technique which is perhaps the most widely used in phylogenetic practice because of its superior empirical accuracy. At the theoretical level, except for its consistency, that is, the guarantee of eventual correct reconstruction as the size of the input data grows, much remains to be understood about the statistical properties of maximum likelihood in this context. In particular, the best bounds on the sample complexity or sequence-length requirement of maximum likelihood, that is, the amount of data required for correct reconstruction, are exponential in the number, $n$, of tips---far from known lower bounds based on information-theoretic arguments. Here we close the gap by proving a new upper bound on the sequence-length requirement of maximum likelihood that matches up to constants the known lower bound for some standard models of evolution. More specifically, for the $r$-state symmetric model of sequence evolution on a binary phylogeny with bounded edge lengths, we show that the sequence-length requirement behaves logarithmically in $n$ when the expected amount of mutation per edge is below what is known as the Kesten-Stigum threshold. In general, the sequence-length requirement is polynomial in $n$. Our results imply moreover that the maximum likelihood estimator can be computed efficiently on randomly generated data provided sequences are as above.Comment: To appear in Probability Theory and Related Field